Reading and navigation come first.
The interface is designed around semantic headings and landmarks, a skip link, visible keyboard focus, readable contrast, and controls that can be used without a pointer. Expandable content should expose its state, and page navigation should remain understandable when the layout changes on a smaller screen.
Images receive descriptive alternative text when the scene contributes information. Decorative detail should not interrupt the reading order. Motion is kept restrained and responds to reduced-motion preferences. A visual distinction, such as an evidence grade, should also have a text label rather than relying on color alone.
Testing has a stated scope.
Automated checks can identify some accessibility problems but do not establish complete usability. The current pages require keyboard, reading-order, responsive-layout, and assistive-technology consideration alongside automated results. Passing a check on one template does not certify every later article or interactive tool.
The twenty health, planning and research tools use local calculations. They use accessible controls and local calculations, with their source scope, assumptions and export behavior visible. Automated checks and the review report describe what was tested; this statement does not claim a complete assistive-technology certification.
Accessibility feedback status.
A public contact address is not currently listed. The site does not present an unmonitored address or inactive form as a working support service. When a contact route is available, a useful accessibility report can identify the page, action, browser and assistive technology involved.